One of the most interesting and powerful facts of nature is that when measured against their counterparts, almost all things fall under a statistical bell curve. That means under the law of large numbers, ninety percent of measured items will fall into a range and are therefore essentially basically average, with five percent measuring far above the average and five percent far below the average. This is true for the height of trees, the height of human beings, scores on a round of golf, test scores in school, and, yes, basically in all things measurable. It should be obvious that if there was a quantifiable way to measure companies, we could identify the truly superlative ones.
Once you are free of simply trying to match or exceed benchmarks, you can go about identifying and investing the few individual companies that statistically come up as “outliers.” The best companies to invest in, the ones that have just entered their rapid growth period, are companies that are usually unfamiliar to the public. Even better, they are still below the radar of many professional managers at the large firms.
Often asset management companies will establish artificial barriers that prevent their own portfolio managers from investing in opportunities that are timely. Arbitrary rules are set up allowing for which companies the managers can invest in. Businesses that have been in operation for a minimum of ten years or do not trade with enough daily volume. These obstacles tend to lower returns. Magnet is open to more opportunities.
The unbiased quantitative methodology employed by our Magnet Stock Selection Process allows us to rank all publicly traded companies. Magnet ranks companies by cash flow, revenue growth, operating profit margin acceleration, and a host of other fundamental criteria and then combine this ranking system to establish a total Magnet® score. Several more levels of analysis are then required, but we are starting with elite companies.
Buying and holding the “wrong” stocks is a sure-fire ticket to the poor house. Taking small profits in companies that turn into major winners can feel equally frustrating. My answer to this dilemma is the “gardening approach” with your portfolio. This style suggests being patient and letting your winners grow, while periodically weeding out those ideas that simply are not developing.
Current Top Ten Magnet Stocks for Consideration:
(I have removed a few companies from this list that have had outsized returns since this newsletter began on July 15, 2024. They may be great companies, but the recent stunning returns do not suggest a good entry point today. Applovin is up more than 225% since July and 100% just last month. I also suggest you use stop losses. The July issue showed SuperMicro which is now down over 70%. Despite holding SMCI, the July portfolio has shown a return of 18% already. The portfolio we showed just last month returned over 21% as this note is being written. This is not sustainable.)
Top Magnet ideas for consideration:
Symbol Name
ADMA ADMA Biologics
ALL Allstate
BYRN Byrna Technologies
DY Dycom Industries
FOUR Shift4 Payments
FTI TechnipFMC
RSG Republic Services
TJX TJX Cos
VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals
WGS GeneDx Holdings
Be sure to pick-up a copy of Jordan Kimmel's books on Amazon
Please remember to sign-up for Jordan's weekly insights at ProInvestorInsights.Substack.com or MagnetInvestingInsights.com.
For further information: www.magnetinvestinginsights.com
As Trump takes his position, he stands on a monumental political pedestal, one that few presidents before him have reached. Yet, as history has shown, the higher the rise, the steeper the potential fall. While there is optimism in some circles about what his administration might achieve, there are significant economic and policy concerns that suggest a challenging path forward.
Key Economic Concerns and Potential Challenges
1. Spending and National Debt
The escalating national debt and government spending remain critical concerns. Elon Musk has been a vocal advocate for reducing federal spending, but ultimately, Congress controls fiscal decisions. Reductions in Medicare, Social Security, or defense would be necessary to meaningfully cut costs—though such moves are highly unpopular and unlikely to gain traction. Realistically, the national debt may not see much reduction, nor is there likely to be a sharp decline in government spending. Musk’s vision is ambitious, but these needed changes are often politically untenable.
2. Tariffs, Taxes, and Inflation Risks
Balancing tariffs and tax cuts present another economic dilemma. While tariffs may bolster domestic industries, they could also drive-up labor costs if immigrant deportation policies reduce the workforce. Higher wages could lead to inflation. Other global and domestic factors contribute to inflation concerns, including:
A. China’s Economic Stimulus – China is likely to implement post-election economic measures, potentially affecting global inflation.
B. Middle East Conflicts – Escalations in Iran could disrupt energy supplies and add to inflationary pressures.
C. Climate and Food Prices – Unpredictable weather patterns may impact grain and sugar supplies, increasing food prices.
D. Growth and Regulation Policies – Trump’s pro-growth, anti-regulation stance is inherently inflationary, further complicating bond markets and interest rates.
E. Energy Transition – While traditional oil and gas remain essential, clean energy sources like solar, nuclear, and wind will be crucial. The energy landscape will need balance, and relying solely on fossil fuels is unsustainable.
3. Federal Reserve’s Role
The Federal Reserve’s stance on interest rates will be critical. A rate cut in December could drive up inflation while causing bond prices to surge. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and aluminum prices are already trending higher, signaling inflationary pressures in certain commodities.
Should the Fed stay the course after the last rate cut, it sends a signal that there is inflation concern, which could be as damaging as seeing an actual rise in inflation.
Economic Strengths and Opportunities
Despite these concerns, there are positive economic indicators, particularly for small-cap stocks and certain sectors that stand to benefit from Trump’s policies:
1. Small Caps Leading the Market
Many investors view Trump’s policies as advantageous for small-cap companies, especially those focused on U.S. manufacturing and small business growth. The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has outperformed other indexes, doubling their growth. IWM’s potential climb to its 2021 high at $244.50 and beyond reflects optimism in American manufacturing and growth-focused policies.
2. Retail and Consumer Sectors
Although retail (represented by the XRT ETF) has underperformed, a breakout above 80 could signal confidence in Trump’s deflationary policies, benefiting both small caps and retail. However, with interest rates high, consumer spending remains a vital component. Without consumer support, the market and broader economy may struggle to sustain momentum. This economic landscape differs sharply from the pre-Trump era of 2016.
3. Bitcoin and Digital Assets
Bitcoin has shown strength, maintaining a positive trajectory. However, it needs to hold above the $74,000 level to retain investor confidence and market strength. Our current target is close to around $90,000.
4. Seasonal Market Momentum
Historically, markets have rallied after elections, with seasonality offering a bullish factor that could encourage growth in the coming months.
Investment Recommendations
Given these market dynamics, several assets and sectors show promise for investors willing to navigate the complexities of today’s economy:
1. Gold and Silver
- Gold is a strong buy on dips, with robust support at $2,500.
- Silver, if it climbs back above $32.50, could also present a buying opportunity.
2. A Few Stock Picks in Key Sectors
Ulta Beauty (ULTA) Currently in a consolidation phase, the stock appears to offer a low-risk buying opportunity.
Alibaba (BABA) Trading within a support zone, potentially undervalued. Earnings on tap.
Stantec (STN) This environmental consulting firm could benefit from Musk’s pro-sustainability outlook.
Symbotic Inc An American robotics company specializing in warehouse automation, aligning with a trend towards industrial robotics.
XLE Energy ETF With global and domestic energy demands, this ETF could capture gains across energy sectors.
Trump’s presidency brings both optimism and caution. While some sectors stand to benefit, challenges like inflation, government spending, and global uncertainties pose risks. Investors should keep a close eye on interest rates, geopolitical developments, and inflationary pressures, balancing opportunities in small caps and energy with the potential for volatility. Strategic investments in certain commodities, and promising stocks across sectors could offer growth amid the complexities of this new economic era.
Watch Mish Schneider's appearance on WealthWise by clicking here:
Fed Rate Cut Predictions & Top Equity Picks: Jordan Kimmel with Mish Schneider
For further information, please visit MarketGauge.com
Here is a buy write on shares of baked goods company Flowers Foods (FLO), which will trade ex-dividend within the next three weeks for a quarterly payout of at least $0.24 per share. The trade offers potential for a 43.7% annualized return through December 20. Although the recommendation is for buying 100 shares of stock and selling one contract of calls, you can scale it up as you see fit. Please email me (dobosz@gmail.com) at any time with questions, and connect with me on LinkedIn. — J.D.
Flowers Foods (FLO) - Buy Write
Originating in 1919 as a small southern bread-baking operation, Thomasville, Ga.-based Flowers Foods (FLO) is one of the largest bakeries in the United States, selling bread and snacks in grocery stores, convenience stores and in vending machines. Its best-known brands are Wonder white bread and the Nature's Own brand of more nutrient-rich breads.
Flowers has made more than 100 acquisitions in its 125-year history to tap into changing consumer tastes. Two of its top-performing and well-known buys are snack cake and donut makers Mrs. Freshley’s and Tastykake. Flowers’ acquisitions of Dave’s Killer Bread and Canyon Bakehouse make Flowers the largest organic bread company in the U.S. It has seen rapid growth in recent quarters from Dave’s Killer Bread product extensions in snack and nutrition bars.
Revenue this year is expected to grow 1% to $5.12 billion, with earnings higher by 5.7% to $1.27 per share. The next earnings report is not until February.
At 17.3 times year-ahead earnings, Flowers trades at a 15% discount to its five-year average P/E ratio. Along with the discounted valuation, Flowers feeds nice dividends, currently good for a yield just above 4.4%. The next dividend is still undeclared, but the last payout was $0.24 per share, and the fourth quarter ex-dividend date has historically been the final week of November or the first week of December.
We hold Flowers Foods in the Forbes Billionaire small and midcap portfolio, as several billionaires have been buyers of the stock over the past year, including Ken Fisher, Ken Griffin, Steven Cohen and Mario Gabelli.
Here is the buy write: Buy 100 FLO, and sell to open one contract of $22.50 December 20 calls for a net debit of $21.80 (stock price minus premium) or lower.
If we earn a $0.24 per share dividend, and if FLO closes above $22.50 on December 20, we will be assigned and earn a total of $0.94 per share on $21.80 per share at risk, or 4.31%. Over 36 days, that would be 43.7% on an annualized basis. If FLO closes below $22.50 at expiration, we will still own the stock at a cost basis of $21.56 per share, reflecting the premium earned today, and the dividend in a few weeks.
Bagging Premium And Dividend With Tapestry Buy Write
Companies that produce and sell luxury goods have been given a warm market reception following the election. Unlike dollar stores who will likely see reduced demand in the face of higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods, luxury shoppers are less price sensitive and more insulated from higher impor costs. In addition, luxury brands have stores in Europe, Asia and elsewhere outside the U.S. will that will not be hit with tariffs.
One of these brands is handbag and accessories maker Tapestry (TPR). With an upcoming dividend in three weeks, we will do a buy write. Please email me (dobosz@gmail.com) anytime with questions. — J.D
Tapestry (TPR) - Buy Write
New York, N.Y.-based Tapestry (TPR) is a maker and retailer of luxury accessories and lifestyle brands, including handbag specialists Coach and Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzmanan shoes. It sells through company-operated stores, department stores, internet, and independent distributors.
Revenue this year is expected to rise 1.4% to $6.8 billion, with earnings up 6.3% to $4.56 per share. Tapestry trades for 12.7 times year-ahead earnings.
Tapestry’s next earnings report is not until February, and the stock trades ex-dividend on December 6 for a $0.35 per share quarterly payout.
Here is the recommended buy write: Buy 100 TPR, and sell to open one contract of $58 December 27 (weekly) calls. Use a net debit of $55.90 or lower.
If we earn the dividend on December 6, and if Tapestry closes above $58 at expiration, we would be assigned and earn $2.45 per share on $55.90 at risk for a total return of 4.38%. Over a 43-day holding period, the annualized return would be 37.2%. If TPR closes at or below $58 on December 27, we will still own the stock at a cost basis of $55.55 per share, reflecting the premium earned today and the dividend on December 6.
Options income for this trade: We earn $195 selling 1 TPR December 27 (weekly) $58 call contract.
NOTE: Forbes Premium Income Report is intended to provide information to interested parties. As we have no knowledge of individual circumstances, goals and/or portfolio concentration or diversification, readers are expected to complete their own due diligence before purchasing any assets or securities mentioned or recommended. We do not guarantee that investments mentioned in this newsletter will produce profits or that they will equal past performance. Although all content is derived from data believed to be reliable, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. John Dobosz and members of the staff of Forbes Premium Income Report may hold positions in some or all the assets/securities listed. Copyright 2024 by Forbes Media LLC.
For further information: John Dobosz (forbes.com)
Click here to connect with John Dobosz on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johndobosz/
It’s finally over.
On the one hand, I am obviously talking about the election – it was hotly debated down to the wire, but like him or hate him, Trump won decisively. George Washington won every vote. We’ll never have another president voted in unanimously. That honor is now retired, going to our first president alone.
On the other (a bit less obvious) hand, I am talking about the end of uncertainty. A decisive election allows everyone to move on, if they can. I’m not into politics; I’m into data and investing. As an investor, all one hopes for is a decisive election. That’s what we got, and the market loved it.
The Big Money Index (BMI) is still the best metric for revealing unusually large money flows in the stock market. In October, the BMI became overbought then dropped out of being overbought after only four days. As the election tightened, investors sidestepped risk, moving money out of stocks. Then, after election day (the orange vertical line), money gushed back into stocks.
I told you this was likely, before the election, as this has been the pattern for every election since 1992.
Now, with a clearer horizon, investors wasted no time placing their bets. In fact, the day after the election was the largest single day of unusually large buying since December of 2023 (left chart). ETFs also saw immense buying, equaling the huge buying spike in July, eclipsed only by December 2023 (right chart).
This buying decisively blasted stocks to new highs. In order to make a buy signal, stocks have to trade at new interim highs on unusually large volume. The amber lines below show stock trading on abnormally high volume alone without respect to highs or lows. You can see the big day of buying was major money moving in, also the highest since December last year.
If you have been following me, you’ll know that I have been pounding the table for small- and mid-cap stocks since early last summer. I said that, regardless of which candidate wins, these groups would benefit. But should Trump win, that’s especially good for these stocks. Sure enough, when we look at the distribution of buying since November 1st, we see 86% of stocks bought unusually, were small and mid-cap companies. This launched the Russell 2000 (IWM) into the stratosphere last week.
Out of 490 stocks that were gobbled up in an unusually large way last Wednesday, November 6th, a whopping 138 (28%) of them were financial stocks. In this chart of XLF, we can see that since October of 2023, XLF was looking to break out of a range. In January this year, it took off and never looked back.
On November 6th, the financial ETF (XLF) blasted to all-time highs on immense buying. This helped solidify Financials as the top-ranked sector. We see that in the sector charts, below: Financials clearly had the most unusual buying, while Technology, Industrials, Discretionary, and Energy stocks also saw unusual buying, breaking new high counts set within the last six months.
Materials, Staples, Communications, and Health care sectors also saw meaningful buying, albeit without seeing new high counts. Only Utilities and Real Estate failed to see meaningful buying, but there’s a good explanation for that. Both sectors just recently retreated from highs as they vaulted with imminent rate cuts. As both pay hefty dividends, they are more in demand when rates fall.
So, now what?
For me, the playbook is always the same. I look for the highest quality stocks among those that are seeing unusually larger inflows. Last week, that pool just got bigger, making my job easier.
It’s paradoxical to find great stocks in a bad tape. On the one hand, the selection pool goes way down, but on the other hand the real leaders have trouble hiding in mediocrity. Vice versa, a strong market can make all stocks look good when they all aren’t. So suddenly, we have a lot more stocks rising, but not all have what it takes to make it into my pool of buy candidates.
When selecting my pool of candidates, I focus on using identifying stocks with soaring fundamentals, technicals and money flows. First, let me summarize some of what I look for in the fundamentals:
And here’s some of what I like to see in terms of technical strength:
Last, but not least, a magical trifecta comes when we get unusually large buy signals on one or more of these superior stocks. That indicates heavy accumulation of a stock. And, given that between 70% and 90% of all daily volume is institutional, according to J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley, we want to pay special attention when they are competing to buy the best stocks.
That stunningly simple formula has allowed me to amass a batting average of about 70% of my selections rising over time. The winners are bigger than the losers, so the aggregate outperforms the S&P 500 by 7-1 in one model portfolio strategy since 1990.
I know – it’s more fun to pick stocks when they ALL go up, but that is not realistic.
The good news is that we have a lot more candidates to look at now, as traders think a Trump presidency is good for small- and mid-sized businesses. If you add in falling interest rates removing some headwinds from capital- or borrow-intensive businesses, and we add more fuel to the fire.
I know that this election has made many people happy and many others unhappy. This election was never going to make all America happy, so I choose to focus on things I can control. I can control what stocks go into my portfolio. I suggest you do the same: Focus on how to position your investments to benefit from next year’s market realities, regardless of your feelings on the election results.
“What separates the winners from the losers is how a person reacts to each new twist of fate.”
–– Donald Trump on Twitter, December 2014, six months before announcing his first run for office.
All content above represents the opinion of Jason Bodner of Navellier & Associates, Inc.
Please see important disclosures by clicking here
For further information: www.Navellier.com
The Trump rally isn’t over with stocks reaching fresh all-time highs as investors look ahead to tax cuts, deregulation and made in America policies to power future gains. Market participants are also catching a tailwind from a dovish Federal Reserve, which remained committed to walking down the monetary policy stairs during yesterday’s decision to reduce its key benchmark by 25 bps. Furthermore, news that consumer sentiment jumped to its tallest level since April is also empowering equity bulls and supporting earnings expectations, with the UMich beat dialing down the probabilities of revenue sluggishness.
The University of Michigan Survey of Consumer Sentiment Index recorded its fourth-consecutive month of gains today, climbing to 73.0, up from October’s 70.5 and above the anticipated score of 71.0. The advancement, however, was driven by consumers’ outlook, with the expectations benchmark increasing from 74.1 to 78.5. Consumers’ optimism regarding improving incomes and short-term business opportunities helped push up the headline result. Conversely, the current economic conditions measure fell slightly from 64.9 to 64.4. The outlook for price pressures, however, was mixed, with anticipation for year-ahead inflation easing marginally from 2.7% to 2.6%, the lowest forecast since December 2020. The longer-term inflation result moved in the opposite direction, bumping from 3.0% to 3.1%. The survey was conducted prior to the presidential election.
Federal Reserve policymakers unanimously cut the Fed Funds yesterday to a range of 4.50% to 4.75%, a 25-basis point (bps) reduction, and Chairman Jerome Powell provided somewhat optimistic comments but cautioned that the long-term economic outlook is uncertain. The move followed the Fed’s surprisingly large 50-bp cut in September. In discussing the recent easing, Powell added that the Fed will continue to reduce its balance sheet, and he said risks to the central bank’s dual mandate of achieving full employment and price stability are balanced. In response to media questions, he declined to rule out the possibly of increasing the overnight lending rate in a year or so due to growing uncertainties about the economy over the long term. He also struck a defiant tone when asked if he would honor a potential request from President-elect Donald Trump to resign. Powell, a Trump appointee, has been criticized by the Republican leader, who has implied in the past that the institution is politically motivated. Trump was particularly critical during his first term when he thought the Fed should have been accommodating but was on pause instead. He was also particularly vocal about the central bank lowering borrowing costs a few weeks prior to the election on September 18. Powell, however, has resisted the pressure, explaining that Trump has no legal authority to force him to quit. The chair has also emphasized the importance of central banks having independence from political influences. Powell’s term expires in May 2026. In a related matter, Powell said the Fed will continue to base its decisions on economic data rather than attempting to anticipate the potential impacts of Trump’s proposed policies.
Markets are buoyant with equities climbing higher while bonds also add to gains as yields retreat. The dollar is also in the green and serving to tighten financial conditions as it weighs on commodities. All stock indices are pointing north with the Dow Jones Industrial, S&P 500, Russell 2000 and Nasdaq 100 benchmarks up 0.6%, 0.4%, 0.3% and 0.1%. Sector breadth is positive with seven out of eleven equity segments up and being led by real estate, utilities and consumer discretionary, which are higher by 1.6%, 1.4% and 1.3%. Meanwhile, communication services and materials are the biggest laggards; they’re losing 0.6% and 0.5%. Rates on the 2- and 10-year Treasury maturities are moving lower by 1 and 5 bps with the instruments changing hands at 4.20% and 4.28%. The greenback’s index has climbed 36 bps as the US currency appreciates versus most of its major counterparts, including the euro, pound sterling, franc, yuan and Aussie and Canadian tenders. It is depreciating relative to the Japanese yen, however. In commodities, crude oil, copper, silver and gold are lower by 2.5%, 2.3%, 1.7% and 0.5%. Lumber is bucking the trend due to relief at the long end. The critical construction material has advanced 1.2%. WTI crude is trading at $70.33 per barrel on curbed weather concerns related to Hurricane Rafael that could have harmed stateside energy infrastructure.
Much of my conversations this week focused on the accuracy of the IBKR Forecast Trader platform relative to national polling sources regarding this year’s elections. As we all know, polls were reflecting a neck and neck race while our IBKR Forecast Trader marketplace during most trading days since early October favored a Trump win by a wide margin. Now that election day is behind us, we have a long list of economic indicator contracts available to trade as well. Participants may choose Yes or No. Finally, I’m seeing some compelling opportunities in our marketplace for next week, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), Producer Price Index (PPI) and Retail Sales report on the economic calendar. The Yes for the PPI is priced at 72% for a figure above 1.3% year over year (y/y), but wholesale prices have increased during the period while Wall Street economists’ have a median estimate of 2.3%. CPI and Retail Sales don’t offer much of a discrepancy relative to expectations, with the Yes priced at 72% and 51% for data above 2.5% y/y and 0.3% month over month while the median projections stand at 2.6% and 0.3%, respectively.
The Stock’s Rising Sentiment Means Investors are Catching On
Vimeo, Inc. (NASDAQ: VMEO), considered in the past a rival to Alphabet’s YouTube, has slowly transformed itself into a platform to produce, host and, most importantly, distribute high-quality video for professional creators and enterprises. The fundamental story, as reflected in MarketGrader’s analysis, speaks to an investment cycle that seems to be bearing fruit at the right time.
MarketGrader initiated coverage of the stock with a ‘Sell’ rating in December 2021, when it traded at $18.42. We maintained our negative rating until February 29th of this year, when we upgraded the stock to ‘Hold’ with the shares trading at $4.79 a share, 74% below their price when we started covering the company. Since our upgrade, the stock has risen 42% (through November 8th). Today we maintain our ‘Hold’ rating based on our overall grade of 55.0 (out of 100), but we think the company might be on the cusp of reporting a string of strong fundamental results, and based on recent stock momentum, investor seem to agree.
The company’s quarterly sales were essentially flat when Vimeo last reported earnings on November 5th, but its net income rose almost 10% from a year earlier, which, while definitely not spectacular, represents the continuation of a trend towards higher profits, better margins, and rising free cash flow, a far cry from the period between June 2021 and March 2023 when the company reported eight quarterly losses in a row. Given the company’s lackluster top line growth, we give it a middle-of-the-road ‘B’ in our Growth analysis.
Our Value analysis grades the stock a little better, assigning it a ‘B+’, in part because its forward P/E of almost 40 seems relatively high when compared to its EPS growth trend; however, analysts covering the stock have collectively raised their guidance for FY 2025 earnings by 220% in the last three months, which shows up in our Sentiment Analysis (more on this below).
Rounding out our GARP + Quality analysis are our two ‘Quality’ categories, Profitability and Cash Flow, where the stock earns somewhat middling grades of ‘B-’ and ‘B+,’ respectively. In profitability our biggest knock on the company is its inability to translate its remarkable 78% gross margin into much higher operating margins, which stood at 6% in the 12 months ended last quarter (9/30). Assuming the company’s positive free cash flow growth continues, as it has in the last six quarters, we expect its profitability indicators to improve materially in 2025. The company has virtually no debt and cash on hand that’s equivalent to 29% of its market capitalization.
So, in addition to this apparent fundamental turnaround, what caught our attention about Vimeo now? The stock’s remarkable rise in its Sentiment overall score of 9.6 (out of 10), propelled by very strong momentum and impressive strength relative to all U.S. stocks. Two weeks ago, before reporting earnings (and before the U.S. election), Vimeo ranked among the bottom 48% of stocks in the U.S. based on relative strength; today it’s in the top 7%. When comparing it only against all technology stocks in the country, it also went from the bottom 48% two weeks ago, to the top 11%.
The stock’s remarkable Sentiment score propelled it near the top of two of our most popular lists of ideas: MarketGrader’s Best Momentum Stocks and MarketGrader’s Improving Earnings Guidance Stocks. Assuming the recent change in market leadership in favor of small and mid-cap stocks continues, investors could do worse than to tune in to Vimeo’s stock now.
The concept of using “non-financials” or what we call “extra-financials” is relatively new on Wall Street. The idea was born out of the rubble resulting from the catastrophes of WorldCom, Enron, and other high profile blow ups in the early 2000’s.
Investors became outraged, and trust was broken on Wall Street. Our team is trying to help rebuild that trust with FACTS. We are out to prove that optimizing around all your stakeholders, rather than maximizing each quarterly earnings release, makes companies more profitable and sustainable over the long term.
I was on the major financial networks throughout the late 1990’s openly talking about how much financial engineering was going on when public companies were reporting their quarterly earnings. Still, you see the focus on these bottom-line numbers, with most investors clueless of the “engineering” that is taking place. We use unique data points that focus more on cashflow. This helps us to identify conservative accounting, but we wanted more.
New rating services popped up evaluating companies based on their practices. How they did business, as opposed to financial reporting. A company’s “sustainability” was now being considered. With our FACTS data you could rank companies based on their accounting conservativeness, corporate governance, and the transparency of their business practices. We insisted on using only data that was difficult to game. No rigged surveys. We took three years to build the FACTS Framework. FACTS is now available to the public and has been running for 13 years with separately managed accounts.
Trust 200 Index
You can follow the Trust 200 Index, maintained by IndexOne in London.
This index is only rebalanced annually. This chart is fun as it shows the companies currently leading the index year- to- date. It’s like watching a yearlong race.
The Trust 200 Index, based on the FACTS model, has continued to outperform all major diversified indexes over the last 13 years. The index was created by Index One, based in London. You can follow the index by clicking here.
To learn more about FACTS with exclusive details from Jordan Kimmel, please watch this short video: Jordan Kimmel shares the FACTS model
Separately Managed Accounts based on FACTS and the "most trustworthy companies in America" have been live for years and are currently available for investors.
For further information: www.MagnetInvestingInsights.com
This month, I asked Chris Preston, Chief Analyst of Cabot Value Investor, for a value stock recommendation. He gave me a couple of ideas, but said this one is his favorite (at the moment!). And since the other hat I wear is as a real estate company owner, I thought the timing was right. After all, the housing market is looking better—lower rates are going to improve demand, inventory is increasing, and home price increases are starting to stabilize.
Here is Chris’ recommendation:
Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL): Investing in a Luxurious Lifestyle
Recommended by Chris Preston, Chief Analyst, Cabot Value Investor
“Six years ago, in the fall of 2018, few new homes were being built in the U.S. From May 2018 to the end of that year, housing starts declined steadily from 1.36 million units to 1.09 million units, a two-year low. The reason was obvious: 30-year mortgage rates had spiked to 4.8%, their highest point since early 2011, as the Federal Reserve—in an effort to combat creeping inflation (sound familiar?)—had raised short-term interest rates from near zero at the end of 2015 to 2.4% by December 2018. New home sales slowed, so fewer new homes were being built.
“So, the Fed pivoted and started slashing rates. By the end of 2019, the federal funds rate was down to 1.5%, the 30-year mortgage rate had dipped to 3.7%, and, sure enough, new homes were being built again, to the tune of 1.55 million units, a post-Great Recession high.
“Then Covid happened, and all trends went out the window. The Fed immediately slashed rates back to near zero, but few houses were being built. Housing starts bottomed at 931,000 in April 2020, because almost no one was looking for a new home in an uncertain new pandemic world.
“The housing market was red-hot for nearly two full years, with housing starts doubling from the April 2020 bottom to the April 2022 peak at 1.83 million units built. That, of course, is when it became crystal clear that inflation was not just “transitory,” to borrow a poorly chosen Fed term.
It was here to stay.
“By October 2023, mortgage rates had spiked to nearly 8% after the Fed had raised interest rates from near zero to the current 5.25%-5.5% range to bring inflation down from four-decade highs. High mortgage rate fatigue has taken a toll on the housing construction market, as only 1.24 million new homes were built in July, the lowest monthly tally since the early days of Covid.
“That’s about to change.
“The Fed is seemingly hell-bent on slashing interest rates fast. Historically, when the Fed cuts interest rates, homebuilder stocks are among the first to benefit. In the second half of 2019, before Covid arrived: The Fed slashed rates by 100 basis points, and housing starts—at multi-year lows at the end of 2018—spiked to a 13-year high by January 2020.
“And, in 2019 and early 2020 (before Covid hit), during which the Fed cut rates from 2.5% to 1.5%, homebuilder stocks were up 64%, more than double the 30% bump in the S&P 500.
“That’s a fair template for what could happen this time around, especially given that mortgage rates are twice as high as in mid-2019—and there’s theoretically more.
“I think we could see similar outperformance in the homebuilders this time around. And now, there’s another potential tailwind, according to an industry source who co-founded a residential development firm that builds single- and multi-family homes in the southeastern U.S.:
“Homebuilders are attractive to me because they are no longer real estate companies,” says the source, who preferred to remain anonymous. “They are really manufacturing companies now, like a car maker, but with a greater upside on the residual value of their product.
“The big shift to me with the homebuilders,” he continues, “is that they’ve all switched their models to de-risk their balance sheets and let land developers carry inventory for them until it’s ready to go vertical. So, despite their profit margins not expanding, their IRRs (Internal Rate of Return) are materially up under that structure. So, depending on how well they’ve dealt with interest rate buydowns, their balance sheets are healthy, and they are better built to ride out volatility in the home-buying market, similar to how car manufacturers are set up.
“It’s a nice, sustainable model.”
“Sustainable is a good word to associate with an asset you want to invest in for the long term. And when that asset is on the precipice of a major potential catalyst like rate cuts, it makes for an attractive long-term investment.
“Luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers (TOL) isn’t the biggest homebuilder in the U.S. Its $10 billion in revenue last year paled in comparison to the likes of D.R. Horton’s ($35 billion), PulteGroup’s ($16 billion), or Berkshire Hathaway holding Lennar’s ($34 billion). But it’s cheaper—and growing faster than all of them.
“Now, with the Fed finally cutting rates for the first time in four and a half years, the homebuilders are undervalued, trading at 13x forward earnings. Toll Brothers is even cheaper, trading at 10.6x estimates—and growing faster than the average bear. In fiscal 2024, analysts anticipate 18.4% EPS growth on 7.1% revenue growth, both of which would easily top 2023 results (13.6% EPS growth on a 2.7% downturn in revenues).
“Those figures are expected to level off next year—to 3.6% revenue growth and flat EPS. But the company has a knack for topping EPS estimates; it’s done so comfortably in each of the last four quarters, so it’s quite possible those estimates are conservative, especially if the industry-shifting catalysts discussed above are not being factored in yet.
“TOL shares have 17% upside to our 180 price target. Up roughly 10% in the first month since we added it to the portfolio, it’s possible that price target is conservative.
“If the Fed cuts rates more than once this year (September is assumed), I think it could reach our target quite soon. But with rates likely to come down much further in the next 12 months and
with a sea change in the way homebuilders do business well underway, there’s a case to be made for Toll Brothers to be a part of any long-term portfolio. BUY.”
Toll Brothers was recently upgraded to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), based on rising earnings estimates, now at $14.52 per share for the fiscal year ending October 2024, an increase of 17.5%.
Currently, 46 hedge funds are owners of the stock of Toll brothers. And Bank of America just raised its price target for the company, to $165.
Although housing has had its challenges this year, the luxury housing market (Toll Brothers’ arena, prices from $400,000-$600,000) is still healthy. And with the company’s wide geographic diversification, its entry into more sustainable products (such as its recent agreement with Sunrun to provide solar power and storage to its homes), and the resurgence of the home building industry, I’d take a bet on this one.
For further information: CabotWealth.com
"Repositioning the United States Furnishings and Decor Industry with Artificial Intelligence Creates Emerging Investment Opportunities and Profit Potential"
The furniture, accessories, wall art and soft furnishings is a staid but very stable industry, always growing approximately 4.5% to 6% per annum. It is an industry that can never be eliminated. All humans need these sectors’ products. They can’t be replaced, only made better and sold more efficiently.
Improving the traditional U.S. furnishings and decor industry requires a blend of strategic innovation, technology adoption (artificial intelligence) and customer-centric practices to adapt to changing consumer expectations and market dynamics.
This is the current situation in the Furniture, Accessories and Art Decor industry in the United States. Our durable goods behemoth has lost sight of the changing needs of its large-scale real estate customers. Over the past few decades, the sector has successfully streamlined sourcing, production and fulfilment to compete with overseas suppliers in the direct-to-consumer segment. However, in doing so, it has neglected the changing needs of upmarket hospitality brands, premium office tower owners and high-end entertainment operators.
Historically, in any industry neglection spawns’ opportunity.
Gone are the days when such premier customers such as Class A hotels and office buildings were satisfied to see their facilities outfitted and decorated with slightly more expensive versions of home-style furnishings, accessories and art items. Customization is now the goal of brand-enhancement buyers. The intent is to create unique and, if possible, unforgettable experiences for their guests, clients and patrons. The best part is by doing so recurring revenue is created because they usually refurbish every 4-5 years. The questions are: 1) What changes are required, 2) How are “unique and unforgettable experiences” accomplished?
First by restructuring how, where and when products are sourced and produced in a coordinated almost “just in time” manner. Recognizing that the other segments of this industry have not been paying attention to the changing needs of the primary customer base. It presents a special opportunity to establish a coordinated supply chain, aimed at each specific customer’s needs and by doing so, substantially increase profit margins.
Many methods have been used to enhance long-standing practices, distribution channels, customer reach, and increase profit margins. But only one is revolutionary and can be adapted across every segment of this industry and that is a coordinated use of artificial intelligence (A.I.) in each product area.
Artificial intelligence (A.I.) is reshaping industries worldwide, and the home décor sector is no exception. From design to manufacturing and customer engagement, A.I. is transforming how furniture, accessories, and wall décor products are created, marketed, and sold. The integration of A.I. brings new opportunities for personalization, operational efficiency, and data-driven strategies. This shift is changing the landscape of this industry. Premier customers such as our target clients, Class A hotels and office buildings will soon no longer have to be satisfied with 30% - 40% coordinated colors with furniture covers, wallpaper, wall décor, rugs and so much more. A.I. soon will be able to construct a 100% visual coordinated experience across each of the aforementioned areas and more.
This presents a unique value opportunity in an industry that rarely seeks innovation. For inquiries: roger@principalassets.co or roger@artographylimited.com
For further information: www.ArtographyLimited.com
Markets are drawing some quick conclusions from Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential race. Stocks are soaring and bonds are tumbling, a sign investors expect both faster growth and inflationary pressures arising from Trump’s proposed policies.
The market’s knee-jerk reactions may be just that. But if you’re saving for retirement or drawing income from an IRA or other retirement account, you may want to consider some tweaks to your portfolio. While your asset allocation should depend on your long-term goals, not politics, we may be seeing early indications of some broad market shifts that could impact your portfolio income and total returns.
For now the market is expecting a friendlier federal government when it comes regulatory issues impacting wide swaths of the economy. Sectors like banks, industrials and energy are faring well, along with healthcare. Utilities are down, however.
If you’re investing through a broad-market index fund, you’ll capture these sector moves. In each case, there’s nuance to the story.
Banks, for instance, tend to enjoy laxer regulation under Republicans, and the biggest financial companies may get more of break on new capital rules known as Basel III. But banks also need loan growth to thrive, along with a steeper yield curve that would help their net interest income; neither is a given.
For broad exposure, consider the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund. It tracks the market, holding big names like JPMorgan Chase, Berkshire Hathaway, Visa, and Bank of America. If the economy keeps expanding, these financial companies should benefit.
Trump has advanced plans to expand oil and gas production, but the story with energy is complicated by geopolitics and international demand, notably China’s. Oil and gas prices could get a lift if Trump imposes tougher sanctions against Iran and Venezuela, taking some crude oil off global markets.
Yet if he manages to end the war in Ukraine, it could unleash Russian gas, which could send prices lower. Some analysts think Trump’s planned tariffs could also negatively affect oil and natural gas, as they did during the trade wars of the first Trump administration, when U.S. crude exports to China temporarily declined. The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund, holding companies like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips has been rising lately, partly because oil prices have firmed up a bit. It may continue to rally as investors bet on some regulatory easing in the U.S., though its long-term performance will hinge on factors largely beyond Washington’s control.
Winners and losers aside, it’s a good time to build a portfolio of resilient companies that can thrive under different market conditions, Matt McLennan, co-head of the global value team at First Eagle Investments, said at this week’s Barron’s Live. He likes medical technology companies Becton, Dickinson and Medtronic, which generate good free cash flow and have strong market share and below-average dependence on economic cycles.
The bond market is now trickier. Investors are nervous about Trump’s economic proposals, which could rekindle inflation. His policies—including the proposed extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act— may also increase the deficit by $7.75 trillion over a decade, according to estimates by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note soared 17 basis points to 4.46% in trading Wednesday. Other long-term yields also rose. Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions. “The bond market is getting creamed right now,” says Mark Grant, chief global strategist at Colliers’ Securities.
Bond yields were edging up before the election, both on stronger-than-expected economic growth and expectations for a Trump win. If growth continues, it would necessitate fewer rate cuts from the Federal Reserve, leaving rates a little higher than the markets previously anticipated.
Concerns about the deficit and inflation may now come to the fore. “I don’t think rates are coming down much,” says Todd Morgan, chairman of Bel Air Investment Advisors in Los Angeles. He plans to hang onto cash a little longer. And he’s holding off on rolling shorter-term bonds into longer-term bonds, expecting rates rise to further, especially if Republicans sweep Congress.
Should you sell some bond holdings? It’s too early to say. “There’s a lot of noise in the market,” says Daniela Sabin Hathorn, senior market analyst at Capital.com, a global retail trading platform based in London. “It will take a few days to digest these moves.”
In the near term, there’s likely to be less pressure at the short-end of the yield curve, which tracks the outlook for rates more closely than longer-term bonds. Short-term yields were basically flat Wednesday.
As the dust settles, consider shifting part of your bond portfolio into short-term bonds or ETFs like iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF; it was down 0.2% in early trading Wednesday, reflecting its relative stability. By contrast, the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF was down 3.2%.
Other short-term bond funds to consider include SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF and SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF. The latter is a “junk” fund with more credit risk and higher yields than an investment grade fund. It should hold up well if the economy manages to avoid a recession.
Retirees can also make sure they are investing in non-bond sources of income, such as REITs and dividend-paying stocks.
For further information: www.Colliers.com
A new policy of some index funds to allow nondiversification status exposes investors to concentration risk.
Vanguard recently announced a change to the diversification policy for several of its exchange-traded funds (ETFs), including its popular Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). In a supplement to the prospectus dated June 28, 2024, the firm noted, “Under the revised policy, the Fund will continue to track its target index even if the Fund becomes nondiversified as a result of an index rebalance or market movement.” This change serves as a useful reminder for all of us—not just those who invest in the affected Vanguard funds—that increasing fund concentration comes with risk.
The change was made in response to the sharp price appreciation of a small number of stocks, which now represent a significant proportion of certain indexes. While an index’s increasing exposure to a handful of stocks has no regulatory impact, since indexes themselves are not subject to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) rules, there are implications for funds that seek to track the performance of these indexes. As funds track benchmarks increasingly dominated by a handful of large-cap companies, their portfolios become more concentrated, which can result in regulatory headaches for diversified funds.
Equity index funds strive to match the performance of their benchmark index, such as the S&P 500 index. To accomplish this, they typically replicate the index by owning all of the benchmark’s constituent stocks. The weight of each holding corresponds to its market capitalization, although other weighting schemes exist, as I discuss below. Failure to match the index’s weighting scheme can cause the fund’s performance to deviate from that of the index—a result referred to as tracking error. Index funds, by their definition, are expected by investors to have a very low tracking error.
Since funds are regulated by the SEC, they must comply with regulatory guidelines in order to be considered diversified. Under the rule, no more than 5% of a fund’s assets can be invested in any single security, and no more than 25% of the portfolio can be allocated to large concentrations across 10 or fewer stocks. Vanguard’s announcement indicates that its funds will no longer adhere strictly to these limits, allowing them to continue closely tracking the indexes’ concentrated exposure to top-performing stocks.
By being classified as nondiversified, an index fund such as the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF can continue to hold all the stocks in the index in the same proportions as in the index. The consequence for investors is that while an index fund’s tracking error can remain comparatively low as it maintains exposure to the largest companies in the index, doing so can increase the fund’s exposure to a small number of large stocks. This can be a positive while those large companies perform well, but concentrated holdings could magnify losses in a market downturn. Table 1 shows the 10 largest holdings in the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF as of August 31, 2024, and their respective weights in the fund.
As I discussed in my June 2024 AAII Journal article, “Active Investors Can Still Win in ‘Efficient’ Markets,” much of the S&P 500’s return can be attributed to a small number of stocks. As can be seen from Table 1, some well-known technology stocks are among the top 10 holdings of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.
Indeed, in recent years much of the performance of the S&P 500 can be traced to seven large technology stocks, known as the Magnificent Seven. This group comprises Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Meta Platforms Inc. (META), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) and Tesla Inc. (TSLA). Driven by the growth of new technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), the tech sector has been a major source of performance, with the Magnificent Seven in particular producing spectacular gains for investors. From January 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024, for example, an equally weighted portfolio of these seven stocks returned 180%, in contrast to the 51% total return of the S&P 500, as Figure 1 shows.
The S&P 500 is a market-cap-weighted index, meaning that the weight of a stock in the index is a function of its market value. If one stock in the index performs better than another, its weight will increase and that of the other will decrease. Over time, the best-performing stocks account for an increasing proportion of the index. While this means that the index benefits from the price appreciation of these high-flying stocks, it also means that the index becomes increasingly risky as these stocks become more highly valued and potentially overvalued.
Figure 2 illustrates this. The S&P 500 Top 10 index, which consists of the 10 largest stocks in the S&P 500 and is reconstituted annually, has returned 455% over the last 10 years. In contrast, the S&P 500 has returned 239% over the same period.
Because market-cap-weighted indexes are most influenced by the largest companies, those indexes benefit from continued appreciation by those firms in bull markets. In bear markets, this concentration can have negative consequences for index performance, particularly if the larger firms suffer above-average losses. This can often be the case if those large stocks became overvalued. In such scenarios, equal-weighted funds—in which each member stock is equally weighted rather than being weighted by market value—can outperform their market-weighted peers.
The top chart in Figure 3 shows the comparative total returns of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) from January 2023 through August 2024. The market-cap-weighted SPDR S&P 500 ETF outperformed, returning 51% in contrast to the 28% returned by the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.
However, during the market sell-off in 2022, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF outperformed, suffering a loss of 11.6%. This was smaller than the 18% loss experienced by the market-weighted SPDR S&P 500 ETF, as illustrated in the bottom chart in Figure 3.
For individual investors, the difference between the two weighting schemes is important. Market-cap-weighted indexes can enhance returns in bull markets, but their reliance on a small number of large names can increase risk and the potential downside in a sell-off. Given this, investors should consider their risk-reward preferences even when choosing index mutual funds and ETFs.
Rather than equally weighting a portfolio or weighting by market cap, some funds pursue smart beta (aka factor) strategies. These funds include the same stocks as the benchmark index but weight them in the portfolio by factors such as momentum, value or low volatility. These factors are associated by some investors with superior returns. In contrast to market-cap-weighted indexes, smart beta portfolios are less reliant on a small number of large stocks and offer a more balanced exposure across the market. While they don’t overweight large stocks, and therefore may not outperform in a technology rally, they can provide returns that are less volatile than the benchmark and reduce the risk of exposure to overvalued stocks. Figure 4 illustrates the total returns on the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)—discussed in my March 2021 article, “Viewing the Sector Exposure of Dividend Stocks Through the Aristocrats”—the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) relative to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF.
As the chart shows, the smart beta funds, although providing lower returns than the SPDR S&P 500 ETF, have done so with significantly less volatility. These funds may prove of interest to investors who wish to maintain exposure to the broad market but avoid the risks associated with market-cap weighting.
The shift to allowing nondiversification status by index funds, although reducing tracking error (deviation from benchmark returns), maintains an investor’s exposure to concentration risk. If you are comfortable with continued and potentially increasing exposure to a few large stocks, nondiversified ETFs may still align with your investment objectives. However, if you’re concerned about concentration risk or high valuations, you may want to reconsider your strategy. Remember that market-cap-weighted indexes tend to perform well in bull markets, particularly those led by technology stocks, while equal-weighted funds and smart beta strategies may outperform in a market downturn.
Investors are encouraged to periodically review their portfolios, and the underlying exposures of any funds they own, and consider if incorporating a smart beta (factor) or equal-weight strategy makes sense.
For more information, please visit AAII.com
Please be aware that the investment strategies and stock recommendations provided in the ProInvestor Insights newsletter are for informational purposes only. While our contributors are experienced professionals, the views expressed are their own and should not be considered as financial advice. Investing in stocks and other securities involves risk, and you should perform your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. ProInvestor Insights and its affiliates are not liable for any losses or damages incurred as a result of following the recommendations in this newsletter.
Click below to learn more! Subscriptions are complimentary for students and active-duty military and their families.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.